I had my tools in Unix, I didn't in Windows). I never, ever trusted it for data (rather silly, I know, but it was more a matter of tools than environment. Since then I've had a Windows partition, on and off.įor games. In my case, I pretty much *had* to switch (long story I won't bore you with) around 1994. Roughly, either you run a system that can run Aperture and you can consider running it, or you run an open system which probably cannot run Aperture and you don't even wonder about it, and that's the end of it.
#Lightzone pentax software#
I suppose the non-free software out there is very capable.but not so much fun! They are bound to be included somewhere down the line. For the "nice to have"s, apply the Linux philosophy: get involved in development even if only by suggesting features or opening a discussion about them.
I must be missing some huge awesome features of Aperture/Lightroom thats worth the price difference, maybe you pay that much for the painfully slow experience?I have been using Digikam for years but have never used Lightroom or Aperture I cannot comment on any comparison other than remarking Digikam is probably all you'll need when looking at the "must have" features. Hey, just wondering if anyone on here ever used the Linux photo software digiKam, and one of the main two (Aperture/Lightroom) it seems to have most of the same features, at least in the most recent version, and I was wondering if there was wondering what exactly justifies me paying $200 for aperture (I already have it, but eventually I'll have to upgrade) over digiKam.
0 kommentar(er)
